>Back to bbs menu.
but this message will have to be censored fpor the security and the
rights of
the Greater Good of the US Public. Thank you for your
co-operation!
[End of message]
.
.
Message editing menu
L List mess
Leave message menu
U Leave public message
R Leave private message
L Leave message for ALL
S Leave private message for Derec [The Blank]
A Abort to message menu
T Back to top menu
Main menu
M Enter message system
L Access files libra
[Paging Derec [The Blank]]
.
Hello User. What may i assist you with?
Very funny. Actually, I really was looking forward to seeing how the
people here would react to some of the revealtions I've come across
recently after reading the Christic Institutes affadavit! Amazing
stuff. Who is this?
Have you heard of the reporter with the Washington Post that Casey
confided in often, all the way up to his death... At his death,
Casey, stated that Regan knew everything, and that, indeed, it was all
neatley covered up leaving the necessary scape-goats, or congressional
sacrafice.
Right, Bob Woodward. Althoug Danieal Sheehan, the Washington Lawyer,
and John Maytes, the Miami public defendant, have uncovered even more
startling things. Yeah, I know: Ronnie did approve of the arms deals,
etc, the lying, senile
idiot,
it will never come out, though. The public wont learn anything it
doesn't want to learn.
Agreed. But the main reason the public doesn't want to know is it
enjoys national security and stability. I can understand that,
since i don't feel it jepordizes the good of the nation. It was
stopped, and i can't say i necessarily disagree with the whole
thing. The operation was a good idea, if it was carried out
properly.
It was carried out by idiots, however. I would like to see them
encoubter the justicd they claim they support. Is this Robert?
What makes them idiots?
If these individuals were well informed, their actions would be known
and scofed at. The data that tje US gave 10,000 TOW missiles to Iran is
a matter of public r}cord. All any semi-intelligent persoin has to do
is think about this
: Why would "we" Deliver these weapons, AFTER Buckley had died, wheile
Ronnie claimed that the
Unitedv
?States would not deal with terrorist nations? These peoiple were
idiots in my opinoin because they were careless and naive. They made to
many assumptios regarding the political interests of the US people.
They were careless, agreed......... But they were not
naive. This is Robert. First off, the USSR has steadily
become closer and coloser to Iran, while maintaining a safe distance
for world opinion's sake, and also for the Arab's table sake...
Keeping good with all sides involved, and attmepting to alienate the US
from the war. The USSR can't lose in this situation
really... If Iran loses the war and Iraq continues the agresssion
into Iranian territory they can "defend Iranian" interests...
However... Mistake , they can lose... If Iran continues to
win the war, with the help of outiside nations (such as the US and
Israel with arms sales), the USSR can not act. Except perhaps to
save their quasi allie Iraq.... So, the USA is choosing the
greater of the two evils in nmaintaining its own interests. That
war benefits us as long as Iran wins, within limits.
We can't stand for Iran falling... Especially undercivil war
after Khomeni's death.
Right. My choive of naive as an adjective was used to describe the
choice of individuals used to carry out the scheme. Noeth, who made
many of the actual deals, was in fact veryignorant about missiles,
etcetera. He made a few erronious assumptions. The fact is, there are
people here who care wabout whether our leaders intend to obey their
laws or not.
Laws should always be disregarded when they conflict with the interests
they are attempting to uphold. That is exactly what happened.
Yes, but I'm not making that sort of judgement. North should have
realized these things.
He did, that is why, in a manner, he superseded laws... Although
he didn't have the guts to state so, or maybe he didn't know he
was. North went beyond and above the laws to carry out what our
constitution attempts to accomplish. Whether or not he knew that
that was what he was doing is somewhat moot to me.
Yes, but as a result, North will end up in jail before Easter.
I wonder about that. Perhaps he will... With the new
administration , if it is democrat, he probably will. But, i
don7t think the new adm. will be a strong democrat.... or a strong
republican. It will be someone inbetween. I see a radical
in the office next year. A radical within one of those two
parties.
Hmm. I don't know. A lot of this depends on the Walsh and Christic
indictments which are certainly on the way (although a presidential
pardon would impede Walsh). I certainly would not want to see Bush
elected. I was expecting perhaps Dukakis, Maybe Baker.
Baker is strong, and so is Bush. I would favor Bush
though... I like his policies and his politics on a whole.
He's got the necessary experience also for dealings with the soviets
and third world. Wha do you think of Jackson?
I'm sort of ambivalent. You know, I don't expect him to be nominated
because of the superficial fact he's blacl. He seems to come of fairly
well in the few inteviews I've seen, though, before I would support him
I'fd have to see a lot more.
Him being black is of no isssue i feel. It doesn't matter
anymore. The majority of the voting public is hardly
racist. Its not an issue. He is superficial, and he is a
radical. And possibly a rascist, or more speci. a
culturalist. His associations have increminated him time and time
again... Farakan, the PLO, etc... Assad... Not nice
people. He's not a good man.
WEll, I won't deny you your judements! But while, to most of the
peoiple whose opinions I conside, his race is of no issuse, I will say
that no one I've spoken with regards him as a serious (likely)
candidate. My prediction is that it will be Bush and Dukakis.
No one considers him as a serious candidate because he is a
sensationalist. I see Bush, ever so possibly Dukakis, but more
probably Hart. I would like to see
on the rep. ticket Robertson somewhere... On the dem. ticket i would
like to see Simon somewhere also.
Yeah. Simon I would like to see. Robertson? Any desire I have to see
him I would attribute to my need for entertainment. That would simply
be 'fun' as far as I'm concerned. Though, if all the data about the CIA
comes out, Bush will NOT be nominated.
True about Bush..... But, Robertson is doing very well when it
comes down to the line of action.... The polls show him weak, but
you have to look at the audience they are asking... We've got to
go. Maybe we'll stop by on the way to my houe, i doubt it
though.... Leave your message if you will.[Resetting timers]
Ok?
Not tonight, but later. Chatting woith you is interesting. Thanks.
OK... Talk later. [Resetting timers]
[End of chat]
Main menu
M Enter message system
L Access files library
U List names of users
S Chat with Derec [The Blank]
C Change your user info
T Display time and time logged on
G Log off BBS
>Drink Beer
You can hear the muffled noise of your
home Log off? Confirm (Y/N): N
Main menu
M Enter message system
L Access files library
U List names of users
S Chat with Derec [The Blank]
C Change your
u